Find where recurring maintenance problems are costing your operation.
Start with a focused assessment of repeat failures, PM weaknesses, and planning constraints. Get evidence-backed priorities your team can act on, then choose implementation support or ongoing facility intelligence if needed. No CMMS replacement required.
Want to explore first? Estimate the downtime impact or open the free Studio. No sales call is needed to use the free tools.
What does XRVE Reliability do for an industrial maintenance team?
XRVE helps industrial maintenance teams identify recurring losses, investigate their causes, and prioritize defensible corrective work. Start with a defined assessment. Use Free Studio for self-service analysis, or add paid ongoing intelligence and separately scoped implementation only when those capabilities meet your needs.
Free Studio, Professional, and Reliability Improvement Program, plus scoped services.
Compare what every subscription includes below, then review separately scoped services if you need expert assessment, data preparation or implementation.
XRVE Professional
Persistent intelligence for up to 3 facilities, without a per-user maintenance technician fee.
View Professional → Top-tier programReliability Improvement Program
Up to 10 facilities, exclusive portfolio-level improvement capabilities, and one monthly expert-reviewed priority initiative.
View offer → New · Data preparationCMMS Data Readiness
Bring an imperfect export up to the minimum structure needed for XRVE analysis.
View offer → First facility analysisMaintenance Intelligence Assessment
Find the maintenance losses, evidence, and priorities that matter first.
View offer → ImplementationPM Optimization
Rebuild PM content around failure modes, execution, and technical authority.
View offer → TransformationMaintenance Program Buildout
Custom work when the problem spans CMMS structure, PM, planning, and implementation.
View offer →Evidence for everyone. Continuous operations for Professional. Portfolio improvement for the top tier.
Free Studio · $0
Analyze approved CSV and supported XLSX files locally, explore the connected demo, inspect Pareto/P–F and schedule heatmap views, and build source-backed actions.
Explore Free Studio →XRVE Professional · $279/month
Up to 3 facilities. All Free Studio analysis, plus authenticated facility history, reviewed source-mapping evidence, saved decisions, owner follow-up and role-focused reporting. No per-technician license fee. Expert monthly sprints are not included.
Explore Professional →Reliability Improvement Program · $749/month
Up to 10 facilities. Everything in Professional, plus one monthly portfolio sprint and exclusive capabilities spanning CMMS-ready drafts, finance-document review, quarterly health, and cross-site improvement. RCM/FMEA and execution scenarios remain reviewed proposals.
Explore top tier →All tiers use the same evidence-first methodology. Savings estimates are not verified savings; site approvals and actual post-change measurements remain essential. New subscriptions require account and facility onboarding.
See exactly what each level includes.
Start with evidence-rich analysis for free. Professional adds protected, retained facility history and an operating review cycle. The Reliability Improvement Program adds exclusive portfolio-level capabilities, with transparent evidence, assumptions, and review boundaries. Every analysis still declares its source, assumptions and limitations.
| Capability | Free Studio$0Self-service in your browser | Professional$279/monthUp to 3 authorized facilities | Improvement Program$749/monthUp to 10 authorized facilities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyze and learn with the shared Free Studio | |||
| Interactive fictional facility and eight connected reliability modules | Included | Included | Included |
| Free knowledge, tools, leadership Studio, guides and downloads | Included | Included | Included |
| Approved facility CSV and supported XLSX import with field-mapping review | Browser-local | Browser-local Free Studio | Browser-local Free Studio |
| Work-order, asset, PM, backlog and data-quality investigation | Included | Included | Included |
| Pareto: work-order concentration, measured downtime and supplied-currency costs | Included* | Included* | Included* |
| Source rows, dates, coverage, uncertainty and evidence drilldown | Session evidence | Session + saved reviews | Session + saved reviews |
| Exact asset/failure-code links across work orders, PMs, RCA and P–F records | Included* | Included* | Included* |
| P–F assumed time-budget chart and intervention comparison | Screening only | Screening + retained review | Screening + retained review |
| Job readiness, weekly craft/capacity constraint heatmap and scenarios | Included* | Included* | Included* |
| Planner guidance, audience-oriented summaries and on-demand Weekly Decision Brief | Included | Included | Included |
| Local improvement actions, reports and portable workspace exports | Included | Included | Included |
| Persistent facility intelligence: Professional and above | |||
| Authorized, authenticated facility workspaces | No account required | Up to 3 facilities | Up to 10 facilities |
| Saved analytical reviews, facility history and repeat-cycle comparison | Browser-local only | Included | Included |
| Stored owners, action decisions, planning records and effectiveness follow-up | Local only | Included | Included |
| Reviewed export mapping, source provenance and documentary data-quality findings | Local mapping | Authorized upload review | Authorized upload review |
| Management reporting from retained facility history, including audience-focused PDF | Local reports | Included | Included |
| Advanced source-reviewed functional verification and multi-period trend screens | Basic intervention screening | Included, with source review | Included, with source review |
| On-demand facility-level management and decision reviews | Local data | Retained facility data | Retained facility data |
| Exclusive to the Improvement Program | |||
| Monthly expert-reviewed reliability improvement sprint | — | — | One selected portfolio priority/month |
| CMMS-ready work-package drafts and implementation evidence review | — | — | Included; site approval required |
| Improvement/financial evidence register and ledger-document reconciliation | — | — | Documentary review; not certified savings |
| Quarterly maintenance program health review and executive evidence maturity | — | — | Included |
| Multi-facility failure-pattern, transfer and intervention comparison | — | — | Included; comparability reviewed |
| Action-linked RCM/FMEA worksheet, P–F engineering screen and independent review | — | — | Included; not approved PM changes |
| Craft-capacity, materials, shutdown and scenario sensitivity screening | — | — | Proposed plans and assumptions |
| Cross-site standard applicability, implementation, regression and adoption evidence | — | — | Documentary review |
Reading this comparison: Asterisked views require supporting data and applicable measurements. Supported XLSX files are parsed locally; not every workbook format is accepted. A source work-order row is not automatically one physical failure. Cost Pareto requires an explicitly supplied currency, and rate comparisons require compatible, reviewer-supplied exposure. The free Studio may hold multiple browser-local workspaces, but these are not authenticated paid facility slots, and a local free workspace is not automatically migrated into a paid account.
Analyze real approved exports, examine Pareto and P–F evidence, and build local actions.
Open Free StudioSave and review authorized facility intelligence across up to three sites.
Explore ProfessionalCoordinate one portfolio priority each month, plus specialized improvement and evidence workbenches.
Explore Improvement ProgramAlso $7,490/year for the same up-to-10-facility scope.Technical and commercial boundaries: The single expert-reviewed monthly sprint is across the authorized portfolio, not one per facility. RCM, FMEA, P–F, schedule and scenario outputs are reviewable proposals, not engineering approval or work authorization. Finance and implementation registers track sourced and independently reviewed documents; they do not establish independently verified savings, actual execution or causal benefit. On-demand briefs are not scheduled monitoring. Existing CMMS remains the system of record. No tier includes automatic vendor-API connectivity, direct CMMS writeback, unlimited consulting or guaranteed savings. Subscription access requires authenticated facility onboarding.
XRVE Professional · $279/month · up to 3 facilities
Preserve the Free Studio's evidence-first investigation and visual tools in an authenticated workflow. Save facility analytical snapshots, track reviewed decisions and owners, compare submitted review periods, and produce role-focused management reports from authorized historical evidence. Recurring analysis depends on new approved exports, not automatic CMMS synchronization.
Professional does not include a monthly expert-reviewed improvement sprint, CMMS-ready managed implementation packages, the verified savings register, quarterly program health reviews, or premium cross-facility improvement analysis.
Start with the maintenance problem you need to solve.
These capability pages explain how XRVE approaches four common consulting needs and connect each one to the appropriate service path.
Industrial reliability consulting
Use failure history, bad actors, recurrence, PM evidence, and asset context to identify the reliability work that deserves attention first.
Reliability consulting →CMMS consulting
Improve asset structure, work-order evidence, PM data, backlog semantics, and export readiness without forcing a system replacement.
CMMS consulting →Maintenance planning consulting
Strengthen ready backlog, job planning, weekly scheduling, break-in control, labor loading, and execution feedback.
Planning & scheduling consulting →Preventive maintenance consulting
Challenge PM task quality, failure-mode coverage, interval basis, acceptance criteria, and corrective follow-through.
Preventive maintenance consulting →CMMS Data Readiness Package
For teams that cannot yet produce an analysis-ready CMMS export. We help turn the export you can produce today into a clean, documented dataset that meets XRVE's minimum upload requirements.
Starting at $2,500
Starting-price boundary: the $2,500 starting scope assumes the underlying maintenance information substantially exists and can be exported in structured form. Significant manual reconstruction, hierarchy rebuilding, mass asset or PM remediation, extensive record linkage, direct CMMS configuration, historical backfill, integrations, or onsite data collection are separately quoted.
You receive
- Column mapping to the minimum XRVE analysis schema
- Normalization of dates, statuses, work types, and common field inconsistencies
- Duplicate, blank, orphaned, and unusable-record review
- Checks that work can be tied consistently to assets and time
- An upload-ready CSV/XLSX plus an exception and gap register
- A repeatable export checklist for the next data pull
Minimum target: stable work-order and asset identifiers, usable work descriptions, work status/type, and enough date structure to place maintenance activity in time. Labor, parts, failure codes, hierarchy depth, and PM fields are mapped when available.
XRVE prepares and normalizes supportable information. It does not invent historical data that was never captured. When the work becomes a rebuild of the maintenance information system, it moves into custom remediation or Maintenance Program Buildout scope.
Maintenance Intelligence Assessment
Recurring breakdowns, emergency work, and ineffective PMs can consume money and capacity without resolving the problem. This assessment identifies where maintenance effort is being lost, shows the supporting evidence and its limitations, and establishes what should be addressed first.
Starting at $2,500
Starting scope includes:
- One facility and one representative production area or approximately 25 priority assets
- One approved and sanitized CMMS dataset
- One 45–60 minute management review
- One clarification and revision round
Typical turnaround: about 10 business days after usable data is received.
Not ready for paid work? Start with the free Health Check.
You receive
- Maintenance Health Report
- Bad Actor / Repeat Failure Analysis
- PM Effectiveness Review
- Data & Planning Gap Register
- Prioritized 30-Day Action Plan
- 45–60 minute management review
You are paying for a defined expert-led assessment and management review, not access to basic analysis or reasoning that Free Studio already provides.
PM Optimization Package
Focused PM optimization for facilities that need better maintenance content, stronger failure-mode coverage, and technician-executable work rather than simply more PMs.
Starting at $4,500
Up to approximately 25 assets and approximately 75 PM or task records in an agreed technical scope.
Typical turnaround: about 10–15 business days after scope and authoritative information are available.
You receive
- Failure-mode-based PM strategy by asset/component
- Technician-executable task wording
- Frequency and frequency-basis fields
- Craft and labor estimates
- Parts/tools where known
- Safety and acceptance-criteria fields
- Source, confidence, and human-review status
- CMMS-ready structured workbook
XRVE Reliability Improvement Program
Across up to 10 authorized facilities, coordinate one expert-reviewed monthly priority and examine related evidence through portfolio failure-pattern investigation, RCM/FMEA review, P–F engineering screens, capacity and material scenarios, implementation-document follow-up, and finance evidence reconciliation. These are transparent decision-support workbenches, not automated engineering, CMMS writes or certified financial results.
$749/month · up to 10 facilities
Annual billing remains available at $7,490/year. One monthly improvement sprint and its reviewed implementation package are scoped to a selected priority initiative within the portfolio, not ten separate consulting projects.
Facility onboarding and export mappings are agreed before multi-site analysis. No automatic CMMS writeback, guaranteed savings, or unlimited engineering consulting.
Exclusive to the Improvement Program
- Monthly reliability improvement sprint: one prioritized, expert-reviewed improvement initiative
- CMMS-ready implementation packages: source-linked proposed work, RCM/FMEA and execution-evidence dossiers for site engineering and safety review, not automatically approved CMMS changes
- Improvement and savings evidence register: track baseline, interventions, follow-up and accounting-document reconciliation; recorded or independently document-reviewed claims are not independently verified savings
- Quarterly maintenance program health review: examine program condition, evidence maturity and a source-linked five-minute executive review queue
- Multi-facility improvement opportunities: review failure-pattern, intervention replication, technical-standard applicability and cross-site outcome differences with stated comparability limits
Maintenance Program Buildout
Custom-scoped work when the problem spans multiple parts of the maintenance system and cannot be solved responsibly through a single analysis or focused PM package.
Custom quote
Final investment depends on what already exists, what must be rebuilt, asset and PM population, CMMS/data condition, facility complexity, implementation depth, onsite requirements, training, and schedule.
Final investment is defined in a statement of work after discovery. There is no public starting-price or upper-price anchor for Program Buildout.
Possible scope
- Asset hierarchy and naming standards
- Criticality development
- PM program rebuild
- Job plans and planning standards
- Failure-code structure
- Backlog and scheduling workflow
- CMMS cleanup/import files
- Implementation support and training
Start with the failure mode, not the calendar.
PM optimization is strongest when the task, failure mechanism, observable condition, acceptance criteria, and technical authority all connect back to the physical asset.
Already know you need help? Request a paid scope discussion.
Tell us what you are trying to solve and which offering looks closest. We will determine whether a standard starting scope fits or whether the engagement needs a custom statement of work.
- No purchase commitment.
- No requirement to complete the free Health Check first.
- Pricing and custom-quote boundaries stay transparent; complexity changes scope instead of hiding work.
- Customer, OEM, site engineering, safety, quality, and regulatory authority remain controlling.
See the evidence and workflow before choosing a paid engagement.
Review a fictional Health Report, bad-actor analysis, PM review and action plan, or open the connected fictional facility in Free Studio. Pay only when persistent facility intelligence, a recurring review cycle or a separately scoped expert engagement solves a problem your free tools cannot.
Explore connected Free Studio View sample report Request paid scope